If you run campaigns on Facebook, PlentyofFish, Myspace, do media buys or run any image based creatives, this will benefit you. I don’t know if this is old news or new news. It doesn’t matter, it’s still frikin awesome! Riley Pool touched on it in one of his blog posts but this is so sick I had to break it down into detail.
How many times when starting new campaigns have you struggled to find the right images?
Have you ever been scouring Google images for hours looking at page after page of bad image results?
In my experience finding the right images is the most consuming part of creating a campaign. You can’t automate this process. You can’t write a script that will do the job for you.
- Google images is crap full-stop.
- Flickr.com is ok but you get a lot of irrelevant results.
- Sxc.hu is very limited.
- Yahoo images is the worst of all.
I now introduce to you a solution that will make your heart flutter…Bing Bing. Ching Ching! A.k.a Bing.com image search.

Even though I love Bing image search, I didn't use it to search for an image of Bing image search. I used a thing called a "screenshot" (futuristic technology).
Bing’s layout allows you to view all image results on one page. You can scroll down ’till the end of the Internet. They don’t clutter the page with descriptions about the image. You can just hover over the images if you want to find out more. I’m not exactly sure what they have added to their algorithm but image quality and relevance seems to be so much better the Google images.
A feature I find awesome which is actually on both Bing and Google images is the ability to search for just faces.
Faces are extremely important.
Faces are the first type of image I look for when setting up new campaigns. They are nearly always the most clicked images. People’s faces are more appealing than plonking an image of a product that everyone has already seen. On a more psychological level (at least my own personal unqualified analysis…but hey it seems to work) I think human faces better communicate a sense of trust and engage the user in a more emotional connection.
So now you can quickly gather a bunch of images for your new campaigns. But it doesn’t stop there. You will see a trend of which types of images work best. Pick out your top 3 and head on down to istockphoto.com. They have a HUGE gallery of insanely crystal clear professional photos. Investing in these images will make your CTR go from good to great. Plus if you’re running a large campaign with images that you don’t have rights to, you could get screwed
Now go impress the internet with your brand spanking new high quality images!







Hey Lorenzo, I was glad to see you put a link for iStockPhoto in there. Browsing for free images used to be my preferred method but I wasted tons of time doing it that way. A huge timesaver for me is going to iStock or Dreamstime and buying an image for a dollar or two. Time is more important than free.
I will check out the bing image search though.
~ Corey
[Reply]
Lorenzo Reply:
February 16th, 2010 at 3:58 pm
Oh nice I never heard of Dreamstime before. It’s a good one!
[Reply]
Where have you been my entire life?
[Reply]
Great resource Lorenzo..thanks!
[Reply]
droppin nuggets non-stop on this blog
[Reply]
Great post man, I never actually thought of using bing for images.
[Reply]
Bing FTW!
[Reply]
Yep Bing is absolutely the shitness
[Reply]
nice – thnx
[Reply]
Good call, i had spotted how good Bings image search was but I hadnt joined the dots and thought of it for LP images, thanks!
[Reply]
Just be careful what you are doing with the images or where you are getting images. You can get in real trouble if you start ripping copyrighted images or whatever (Or you’ll get served from Shoemoney or something).
[Reply]
Lorenzo Reply:
February 16th, 2010 at 3:56 pm
Yep exactly. Hence my point about moving onto istockphoto.com.
[Reply]
1. Read MrGreen.am
2. Quit Job
3. Find Images on Bing
4. ????
5. Profit
[Reply]
Your blog is awesome, keep it up.
I know you mention istockphoto.com to stay in the clear but its impossible to use istockphoto for all your facebook marketing needs.
What is the actual deal with using images you find online? I mean pretty much every site does it. Can we be sued for any gains we made from using the images? Have you ever looked into this since you spend a ton on advertising?
Also Shoemoney is a hypocrite. Just look at his blog, he has 100s of pics of people that have not consented to be in the images on his blog. He technically needs each one of them to sign a consent form to use their image. Same for the videos. He is profiting from their images, just by having ads on his site next to their pics.
One other thing I wonder why happens if you distort an image or pic of someone. How can they really prove its their copyright or whatever.
[Reply]
Lorenzo Reply:
February 16th, 2010 at 8:48 pm
Tony,
It’s not impossible to use istockphoto for all your Facebook marketing needs. However I get what you mean. It’s a very pricy solution for small tests. It then comes down to personal choice. You can get sued for using images without permission. If you want to follow the 100% correct white line road then you have to get rights to all the images you use. You can still use Creative Commons Search. It only returns of images available for reuse from Google Images and Flickr .
In terms of the distorting an image, that is a tough one. The rules aren’t as black and white around that. It’s an interesting topic, ill look into it.
[Reply]
your blog has been off to a ridiculously solid start.
[Reply]
Lorenzo Reply:
February 21st, 2010 at 2:12 pm
Thanks conv3rsion!
[Reply]
@Tony – there was a lawsuit perez hilton won not too long ago where he used Associated Press images or something like that and added annotations for comedic purposes.
If you’re using the images for advertising and just changing colors, I’d say that is still murky waters and not worth threats of a legal action.
[Reply]